Anything can happen, but Consistency is Key.

[fighter]

Nicklesbe said:

fighter said:

Dr.Henry_Killinger said:

How is it unfounded? The worse the performance in the first 10 months, the better the performance must be in the holidays to make up for it. Its basic arithmetic. In simpler terms if you get C at the end of the year which is A(Else) + B(Holiday). The smaller A gets, the bigger B must be just to maintain C, let alone increase it.

that is not what you wrote

1) if the last two months can outsell the rest of the year = a short burst of sales can make up for the sales of the rest of the year

vs "on the contrary"

2) if the last two months can outsell the rest of the year = the sales in the Holiday period are mediated by the performance during the longer Else period

 

1) is not contrary to 2)

Actually it is contrary because 1) states that a short burst can make up for the rest of the year. 2) states that the holiday months are dependant on the rest of the year. IE it is a long building slow burst that comes to a head in the holiday months and is completely dependent on the else months performance. Which is the opposite of a short burst making all the difference. Hope I cleared that up for you as it seemed to go way over your head.

I am not arguing against the general point, which is pretty obvious

I am just saying that the argumentation is not logical

 

if the last two months can outsell the rest of the year it actually does mean that a short burst of sales can make up for the sales of the rest of the year

BUT it probably won't happen UNLESS the mediation of the performance during the longer Else period favors it.

 

Again,

2) is not contrary to 1)

2) is a condition of 1)