By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
kowenicki said:
BMaker11 said:
DeadBigfoot21 said:
kowenicki said:

Like this you mean?

 

 

Lol owned! 

 

Anyways I thought onLive was dead?


Oh man! I was so owned by a service that A. isn't lucrative with its model (read they burned through $5 million a month with 1800 concurrent users) and B. had shitty framerates, low resolution, and bad input lag.

Sick burn, Kowen. It totally wouldn't have been a better experience if they charged more to maintain the service. I'm gonna head to the nearest burn center and apply water to the affected areas.

/s


So sony only has the resource, power and tech of Onlive?  Gotcha.

I dont realise, thanks for filling me in.  In that case...you are right, they best stick to an unattractive pricing strructure to limit take up.


Other then the 2.99 for 4 hours, how is 7.99 for 7 days and 14.99 for a month bad???? Redbox does Ok with that no? oh wait sony system got ya.