kowenicki said:
BMaker11 said:
DeadBigfoot21 said:
kowenicki said:
Like this you mean?

|
Lol owned!
Anyways I thought onLive was dead?
|
Oh man! I was so owned by a service that A. isn't lucrative with its model (read they burned through $5 million a month with 1800 concurrent users) and B. had shitty framerates, low resolution, and bad input lag.
Sick burn, Kowen. It totally wouldn't have been a better experience if they charged more to maintain the service. I'm gonna head to the nearest burn center and apply water to the affected areas.
/s
|
So sony only has the resource, power and tech of Onlive? Gotcha.
I dont realise, thanks for filling me in. In that case...you are right, they best stick to an unattractive pricing strructure to limit take up.
|
Other then the 2.99 for 4 hours, how is 7.99 for 7 days and 14.99 for a month bad???? Redbox does Ok with that no? oh wait sony system got ya.