By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
kowenicki said:
MentalDancing said:
kowenicki said:
BMaker11 said:
 

Yes, Because video games are just like movies. Because running them on 10s of 1000s of PS3s is the same as cheap the Netflix servers. Because actual hardware rendering content and sending it over the internet is the same as encoded video playback sent over the internet.

The inner workings are exactly the same, so the pricing model should be the same. Makes total sense

/s

Like this you mean?

 

 

You're only helping his argument onlive was a massive failure at that price. Hilarious the little anti-sony crusade you are though, yet you had no issue with MS tramping on consumer rights with x1.

 

I dont see this as trampling on consumer rights, not at all. Neither was MS.  They are options, nobody is forced to take them.  That kind of talk is silly.

No, I am merely commenting on the value aspect.  I like the idea of a streaming service.  I want it to come soon and for retail discs to vanish, hence I liked the original ONE model and obvious direction.

But streaming should be a sub model.

Ps. Onlive still exists.

 

 

 


LMAo and your one sided shows, onlive was and is a massive money losing venture, you only helped his argument not yours.  It should be what the market accepts not what some MS shill says ona  forum.

 

Everything Ms did was anti-consumer, and way worse then anything anyone else in gaming has tried.

 

PS: You can take away physical disks without trampling on rights like MS did. MS is one of the worst anti-consumer companies around.