By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
MentalDancing said:
gergroy said:

yeah, because nobody but the hardcore people heard about the terrible x1 reveal because they don't visit gaming websites?  ...or not.  

They could have kept it as a closed beta if they weren't sure about pricing, but they decided to open it up to everybody.  That means that they don't plan to make too many changes to the the service, not matter what they say.  They could and probably will add a subscription model in the future because I don't think there will be much money coming in with this pricing structure.  

Much like playstation home, they are just launching it to the public and using the term "beta" to hide behind its shortcomings.  It is the exact same tactic.  My point is they should have just waited until they had the right approach before they opened it up to everybody.  Because just like playstation home, I think playstation now is going to get so much bad press that it is going to be sunk before it can take off.  

Man what a moronic argument, it's a free market..no one is FORCED to buy anything it's how it works, if it's too costly the market will force sony to adjust. Grasp at straws much?

sure, no one is forced to buy anything.  I'm talking about first impressions and how it can sink a new service.  It has happened before, I even used examples.  

Like the x1, microsoft was forced to adjust to a bunch of stuff with the xbox one.  Is it now selling at the level of the ps4?  No?  why is that?