kowenicki said:
BMaker11 said:
kowenicki said:
Apples and oranges
Streaming service versus hard rentals?? Hard rentals are limited in their scope...OBVIOUSLY, you cant take the whole store home/have it delivered.
Ridiculous comparison. A streaming gaming service should follow a netflix model, not a hard copy rental model. All you can eat for a fair fee.
There is no reason for this model other than profiteering.
|
Yes, Because video games are just like movies. Because running them on 10s of 1000s of PS3s is the same as cheap the Netflix servers. Because actual hardware rendering content and sending it over the internet is the same as encoded video playback sent over the internet.
The inner workings are exactly the same, so the pricing model should be the same. Makes total sense
/s
|
Like this you mean?

|
You're only helping his argument onlive was a massive failure at that price. Hilarious the little anti-sony crusade you are though, yet you had no issue with MS tramping on consumer rights with x1.
I guess redbox and others with similar pries are bad to right?
lol xbox fans grasping at straws as they have not had much to bash sony with this gen. How them WW sales looking?