kowenicki said:
My point, which I thought was obvious, was that the reason for the turn around in profit is largely due to uptake in PS+ subscriptions, whatever Sony may say. This is also obvious. A few million extra subscribers sonce ps4 introduction is good money. (PS+ up 200% since PS4, or rather, since paid for multiplayer introduced) |
Your answer to him is still unrelated to his claim. Sure we can suppose that most of profit is from ps+ (ignoring cost and margin) and say they profit 1 cent on HW only, but that wasn't his point, sounds more like a dig against sony because when you said they only profit on hw because of ps+ you were spinning the point.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
