kitler53 on 31 July 2014
| Burek said: Also, sure, pricing is all over the place, but there are PSN games for $3.99 for 90 days. Which is OK, I guess. But can somebody explain this logic: Obviously, you have to use a PS4. So why is there a game Contrast, 90 days for $11.99, when I can just purchase a PS4 version for $14.99 and own it forever. And that in case I haven't received it for free at launch. Insane! Well, I can't use it anyway, so no biggie, but I see this service flaming out big time unless they fix something. Most of the games right now are mediocre at best, a few gems hidden among a flood of PSN filler. |
as much as i'd like to talk about psnow i kind of have to agree. the technology seems amazing but the business model is pretty broken right now. i want ps4 games not ps3 games. i want a subscription services not a rental service. i want to buy a game not rent a game.
..rentals would probably fly better if psnow was on a more casual device like a smartTV or blu ray player but ps4 owners are not game rental types. right now especially we are the hardest of core gamers and we don't want to rent a game and we don't want to only play really old games.
oh well, it should be better over time.
