I'm a PC and Console guy. The PS4 is about 85% of what I wanted it to be. I feel that a 3ghz hex core and ~7950 (r280) would have been a better way to future proof but it's still far better than the U or ps360 gen. Hitting $399 and being profitable is important. I think production values of AAA games are what makes the difference. However there is a valid point on XB1 being perhaps a bit too weak hardware wise. A Pentium dual core + 750ti can play Titanfall at high setting and low AA at 1080p with less lag and no screen tearing, ditto bf4. And that's a value GPU from the first year of xb1s life. Midrange GPUs from future gens will dominate easily. So while we play and enjoy our console exclusives on ps4 and xb1, I'll continue to play multiplat stuff available on PC there for the best experience for myself. Going 1440p and 1600p until 4k becomes more viable at my budget. I think r390x and gtx880 will make it doable with CF/SLI for 3840x2160 @ 60fps high/ultra which will make things awesome such as Arkham Knight, BF5, Titanfall 2, COD:AW, etc. All while still loving the U and PS4. Win/win. Play what you love, everyone is different.
Existing User Log In
New User Registration
Register for a free account to gain full access to the VGChartz Network and join our thriving community.
