sales2099 said:
Yep, guess were going the platform exclusives route instead of true exclusive route. Of that I am happy to hear at least. The Titanfall explanation (and subsequently its banishment from a Xbox 1 list comparison), just isn't right though. It can't be on the list, yet it is the highest selling Xbox 1 game, it isn't available on PS4, and was a system seller. Do we just ignore that out of some technicality? That is my point. Titanfall is something that Xbox One has over PS4, and we are to sweep it under the rug? But we count FH2 and LBP3 just because their multiplats on previous generations (but not exclusives all the same)? |
TF wasn't "banished" .There are no universal parameters for what can and can't be done. There is no handbook of rules limiting which types of comparisons can be made. No "lol i'm not really on 2 other platforms" cards for games that sell well.
Contrary to the opinions of this strawman you have invented to represent non-MS fans, there is no controversy. There are different lists for comparing different things, same as always. Heck, i included both console and true exclusive graphs in my metacritic thread last year. Why? Because they're different things.
Brand exclusives do add more potential value to a brand than something available to anyone with a PC armed with 4GB of RAM and a mid range GPU from 5 years ago, but ultimately they're still multi-plats.