Sony: EA Access Doesn't "Represent Good Value To The PlayStation Gamer"

[cpg716]

S.T.A.G.E. said:

deviliscry said:

Blood_Tears said:

taus90 said:
Seems like after Xbox one DRM fiasco, as rumored suggest EA had huge role to play, which Sony played the spoil sport in the end. MS and EA sat down and came up new way of stealthily bringing it back... But i honestly don't see any value in this subscription, $5 a month for last years/annualized games, games which people prefer to buy the latest iteration, and get a discount on it. No thank you. Its good that Sony is not supporting such trend.. next thing will have other publisher queue up..Good Move Sony

100%

100%

110% EA publically denied it but I still don't believe them either. MS and EA have been in bed since last year.

Sony's plans for PS Now are just as much supporting this trend. They have already said PS Now will have PS4 games at some point. So it is NO different..

Also.. lets stop saying $5/month..  who wouldn't just pay the $30/year pricing.. which is then $2.50/month..    how do u not see value in $2.50/month.. for games that even at used prices RIGHT now.. would cost you over $75 dollars..