Kane1389 said:
I guess ISIS are not to blame since logic dictates that people who overthrew a ruthless dictator are responsible for the massacers even tho during the Iraqi war the both sides were enemies. Iraq would have gone to shit, with or without US intervention, just like Libya, Syria, Jordan and Egypt during the last few years, just a bit quicker. The problems of this region go beyond your typical MSNBC 'dem evil republcanz want oil!!!'' drivel |
America removed Saddam from power, creating the power vacuum that allowed these rebels to gain power. America did not rebuild the nation or put anything in place to prevent this from happening. America provided funding and equipment for ISIS in Syria. Again, this is 100% America's fault (even a small child could recognize this painfully obvious fact) and you have not made a single statement to even challenge this assertion, let alone disprove it. Also, I love how you bring up the partisan political BS when nobody else mentioned it. I don't watch MSNBC or any other major news network so leave the little strawman where he was (LOL, you always do this). I was never under the impression that the war was for oil, the war was always to please America's masters in Saudi Arabia (again, your statements must be directed at some third party not involved in our "debate"). Finally, I want to know where you found a crystal ball that reveals what would have happened in this region without America's involvement. Seriously, I can not understand what type of "logic" you are opperating on. It doesn't really matter though because America is getting exactly what she deserves, billions in debt and more enemies. Just keep applying the same half-baked strategy to as many nations as possible and you will drown in militant Islam.
