Sony: EA Access Doesn't "Represent Good Value To The PlayStation Gamer"

[Burek]

Goatseye said:

overman1 said:

While I belive there is a need for Options regarding EA access on the PS4, I believe this is very bad and could come back to hurt the cusomers later on. Lets say this works, what is to stop Activision, or Ubisoft or any other publishers from doing this? How many subscriptions would the average gamer have to pay in order to get the "best deals"?

$90 and I'll play Ass Creed, Watch Dogs, Rayman, Destiny, COD, Fifa, PVZ,Peggle, etc... bring it on.

I wish this EA thing works and other publishers do the same. Like you, I would gladly pay for companies I find would bring me value, and not just for those Sony tells me that they do.

People have started hating on this deal, while forgetting that nothing changes for anyone who doesn't take the offer. There are still physical games to be bought and sold and bought second hand, there are still digital games and DLC accessible without subscription at a slightly higher price.

There is nothing that would harm customers. Only an annoying fact that Sony gives you random games, mostly cheap indie ones, while by subscribing to EA, or Activision, Ubisoft, 2K...in the future, you choose your own games.

 

Oh, and the irony ---> August PS+ free game is Crysis 3, an EA game.