Sony: EA Access Doesn't "Represent Good Value To The PlayStation Gamer"

[Azerth]

BillyBong said:

Azerth said:

BillyBong said:

Dr.Henry_Killinger said:

MS fans are beaming right now because Sony is acting like Microsoft, the irony.

Will defend anything MS does, but as so as Sony "takes away an option" its celebration time down in "Redmond"

But I jest.

It seem ppl are confusing this with PSNow, instread of what its being compared to PS+, since the EA Access thing has features of both but PS+ outstrips EA Access in value, they aren't compatible. Probably why its not on Origin either.

nor do people realize ps+ adds in online multiplayer on top of those features you speak of.. which you pay for already with the yearly $50.  EA Access multiplayer will require XBL Gold.. thus uping the actual cost if you wanted the same sorta value found on ps+.

you only need gold for the multiplayer parts of games not the service 

http://www.vg247.com/2014/07/30/you-dont-need-xbox-gold-for-ea-access-unless-you-play-online/

that's what I'm talking about.  Look at their lineup?  BF4?  Fifa?  Madden?  Most are made and catered to the MP crowd..

sure they are pushing the more mp titles but gold is not reguried like you said it is.  if i dont have gold i can still use ea access