By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
GamechaserBE on 30 July 2014
Edit Thread
Intrinsic said:
GamechaserBE said:

Indeed, giving the consumers more options is an anti-consumer business. 

Anyway not giving away new games and discounts on purchases is not so good for 30$ a year

But not giving away new games and discount for 50$ (PS+) is good right ^^'? 

Then we are not even talking about the advantage that people know what they will get for 30$ a year but not with ps plus for 50$ a year..

If you can stop for a second and stop making this a sony vs. thing then you may understand where I am coming from.

We are talking games and discounts here. Thats basiclly what this service does right? PS+ is doing it, XBL is doing it and now EA access.

Again, games and discounts.

I am sorry, I would rather pay $50 and get "games and discounts" from every publisher as it is now rather than pay on a publisher by publishr basis. Cause if this thing takes off, next thing you know ubisoft has theirs, activision, take 2...etc. Before you know what more and more vlue will be leveraged behind these "services" to the point where not paying for it would seem stupid......

So no, down the road I don't see how this is good value. I don't see why adding yet another service to do something that a service is already in place to do is a good thing especially when it reduces the value of the already existing service. Be it PS+ or XBL.

I only said it because it is a playstation representative who were known befoer to say PS plus is good value and so compare it with EA access...

And what you say is what I exactly said before, you rather pay 50$ for getting games/Discounts that you don't know witch one exact will be..

Than pay 30$ for games and discounts that you know witch one it will be from the start...