By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
phaedruss on 29 July 2014
Edit Thread
Soundwave said:
 


I think that would require too much manpower for too limited of an audience. It would also feel like Nintendo is withholding content in a way by selling an incomplete game. 

I'd still want something that is a complete game, but then can have Expansion Paks that are legitimate additions, rather than nickle and diming for things like every character, track, etc. I think that leaves a bad taste in the consumer's mouth. This is basically like what Super Luigi U did for NSMBU. 

Seeing as how the last console F-Zero was 11 years ago too, bi-yearly would be fine with me, lol. I'd gladly buy F-Zero GX even again if Nintendo re-used the exact same engine but just added a new wave of courses to it. 

Thus the subscription model. For the smaller DLC like tracks and such you would get free, for the bigger DLC you'd get a discount. Having DLC doesn't automatically mean that they withheld content on purpose. All games could be bigger and have more content with an infinite amount of time and resources put into it but that doesn't exist in the real world. What this would do is provide constant streams of content for your Nintendo games. Bi-yearly would not work at all for this.