By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
S.Peelman said:
Hynad said:
S.Peelman said:

Lol come on.

Sure it's a good game, though I found it very simplistic on the gameplay side of things, but to give all these 10s again for a remaster? Are those couple extra pixels and a smooth shadow enough to make these reviewers cream all over it again? Less than a year later? Because it's exactly the same in every other aspect. I just don't see it, this ultimate praise the game gets. Not to sound salty, I liked it, but, overrated much?


If it's the same, why wouldn't it deserve the same praise it got before? You say it's the same, yet it's an improved version of a GOTY... If it's the same, yet improved, why shouldn't it get at least the same score? Did it get worse because the original came out a year ago?

Because it's the same. We already have it and know it. If they would put it out next year again, the same thing, would that version again deserve the same metascore? It's laughable really. And unfair to new games, if a port with little effort can breeze through the reviews like it's the second coming.

Besides, I already thought it was overrated last year as well. Like I said, I liked it, but I mean, come on .


It's not really fair to drop off the score just because it's the same version, which is also not true. It's the same game that was on the PS3 with improved everything in terms of technical performance, along with DLC included that in the end saves you $10 over buying the original. So credit where credit is due I think it deserves the same score.