estebxx on 27 July 2014
| Experimental42 said: Isn't the Souls series the successor to From's Kings Field series? All they really did was update it, change the controls, and create a similar setting. From has been a great company for a long time. Demon's Souls just gave them more Western recognition. It wasn't even till Dark Souls that the franchise really blew up either, and that's a multiplat. The sad part to me is that Sony has the rights to Demon's Souls so it will never become official Dark Souls canon despite fitting so perfectly into the lore of Dark Souls. |
No it doesnt... both games have very different lore, people just like to tie in little things here and there to try and relate both games despite that From has said a billion time that DaS is a spiritual sequel and not a Sequel, the only real realtion betwen the two games is Patches (the NPC) but thats a easter egg that From has used even in the Armored Core series, anyway if you played BOTH games you should now how vastly Different the lore is.
Edit: the only way i think you could tie both games in, is if DeS happened a LONG time aftter both DaS games maybe then it could make sense, if people forgot what originally happened before in DaS.
