The difference between the failure of the XB1 and the Wii U.

[eva01beserk]

Nintentacle said:

vivster said:

Experimental42 said:

http://plebegaming.wordpress.com/2014/07/25/the-difference-between-the-failures-of-the-xb1-and-the-wii-u/

 

The Wii U is a failure from the sales perspective. It is a failure because of what it hasn't done yet. The XB1 is a failure as well. It is failing because of what it can't do. That's the biggest difference, and only one of those is, relatively, easily corrected.

I thought it was the other way around. X1 because of sales and Wii U because of what it can't.

It goes both ways. The way the article said if you look at First Party support, and the way you said if you look at Third Party support.

Wii U

If you look at third party, the wii u will never have a selling point even if it has the third party game, cuz the ps4 will always look way better. If you look at first party games, the wii u has not realeased all of the heavy hitters and nintendo first party are lnown to push a lot of hardware. They also are known to inovate a lot to breing varied crowds. so we just need to wait for nintendo to bring all their A games not just one.

X1

If you look at third party, the x1 is almost completly dependant on thir party games, worst of all is that third party are not selling ass good as the ps4 because its far inferior so this will never be a turn around for the x1. If you look at first party, the x1 does not have a lot to offer, the only big franchise that can sell the console is halo and its far away, gears has drop a lot in sales and the new one is a totally diferent studio so its unknown potential but still far away. Even if they decide to invest a lot in first party studios by the time they drop wich will be at least 2 years, its going to be to late, the gap betwen the ps4 will be far to large. So in this regard the x1 cant fight with its first party studios.

So no, x1 cant fight in any way, while the wii u can fight with their first party studios.