BMaker11 said:
But that doesn't make any sense. They are all "just as essential", but remove blu ray and the Xbone literally wouldn't work. Remove RAM and the Xbone literally wouldn't work. Remove the CPU and the Xbone literally wouldn't work. Remove Kinect and....the Xbone is just fine. But he wanted to leave the impression that it literally wouldn't work, because it was "as essential as" everything else. "From a business standpoint" is not a factor in what "as essential as" means in the context Harrison was speaking in (i.e. why Kinect cannot be removed). Reading it any other way is spin because a "business standpoint" has nothing to do with physical functionality, like memory, blu ray, and (what Phil wanted us to believe) Kinect does for the console. |
I disagree.
If all of the people claiming that they lied would step back and look at where they were when they said that, it was not a lie. To do what they wanted the XB1 to do, they needed DRM and Kinect, it was required. The original plan for the XB1 was not to be an Xbox720 or PS4. They were hoping to go to another kind of experience and set of capabilities. Obviously the market said NO,NO,NO,NO! So they took the bones of the system and went back to the Xbox 720. It is too bad they didn't plan the sytem out to be more modular from the begining. That way the core fanboys would have had a system that they wanted from the start and the other "deluxe" version could have been for the adventurous types.
It is near the end of the end....