By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DonFerrari on 17 July 2014
Edit Thread
thismeintiel said:
prinz_valium said:
COX said:

There's something I don't understand



These numbers mean (One + 360 Vs Ps4) or (One vs 360 Vs Ps3 + Ps4) ?


one + 360 software > ps4 + ps3 +wii u+ wii + (maybe) handheld software

No, that's an ipossibilty given how the SW is lined up on the charts.  Nope, seems more like MS went pathetic and put the Xbox family against the PS4.  Bravo, MS, bravo.

It could be X1+X360>PS4+PS3, but to think it could be tops all is laughable... When that happened Sony were straight "PS4+PSV tops all combined"



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."