| VanceIX said: Hm? That's not all I think a remaster is. Textures get updated, and lighting gets upgraded, but yeah, it's essentially a re-release, with the same basic engine. Is that bad? No, since remasters are cheap to make and bring in easy profit. But that is the fundamental definition of a remaster. Now, a remake is building a game for the current platform from the ground up. It's much more expensive, and the risk is much, much higher than a remaster. I believe there will be a lot more remasters than remakes overall for that reason. |
Not arguing what's good or bad, just what the facts are.
And yes, I believe there will be more remasters than remakes. Just want it to be highlighted that remakes do in fact happen at least a few times a year, for whatever reason.
Secondly, it's only natural that a new gen will see 'ports'. The same thing happened last gen, and the gen before it.
However, one main difference though with Disney, is their "vault" strategy. Disney doesn't just remaster. That's only 50% of the strategy. I don't see how Sony could successfully complete the disney strategy currently, so it's kind of dumb for them to use Dis as an example.
