Nirvana_Nut85 said:
Nonsequitor, irrelevant, and since you've flamed me at least twice, you are on much worse standing then I.
I received my ban and not cutting the quote tree is quite relevant, please refer to forum rules
You can believe whatever you want, but you can't change my first post, which renders your entire attempt to invalidate me a moot point.
In you opinion, which is incorrect. Invalidating your argument is quite simple when addressing the points you contradicted.
I gave you 3 options, you choose the worst option, just like you refuse to give evidence.
I provided you with evidence and even advised you to google what I had stated as you were well aware that due to the nature of your posts in this & previous threads, that I would not waste my time in a formal debate.
Argues further despite, previously claiming to be done with the argument, if this was an actual formal debate, you would have lost before I even asked you to provide evidence.
This is not a formal debate as stated previously and if it was I would had provided reference. One can not have a debate with someone who constantly contradicts and then lies about what they said, even when provided with evidence.
I don't have to because you're wrong. There is no way you can spin this.
I am not wrong, I have proven this to be correct but nice attempt
Ad-Hominem attack that is irrelevant to the claim. If you aren't aware, an ad-hominem attack is one that attempts disregard an argument based on unrelated facts or in your case opinions. Says their is no point to engaging me in formal debate, despite doing just that, still refuses to give evidence.
And another thing, there is no point to engaging in any formal debate with me IF YOU CANNOT PARTICIPATE IN A FORMAL DEBATE YOURSELF, EVEN A CHILD KNOWS HOW TO PROVIDE EVIDENCE, TO FAIL AT THIS BASIC TASK, completely invalidates any formality in your argument to begin with, these aren't facts these are opinions, your meaningless opinions, that may as well be read on the street corner along with those chanting "The End is Nigh"
I am well aware of the dictionary definition and I had already provided you with an accurate response as to how you were using a link in the form of trying to attack my character instead of actually providing an intelligent response or refuting what my opinion was of ltd sales not reaching 100 mill (for each console seperately).
I find it wildly amusing that you claim my opinions are meaningless. You are aware that they are backed up with facts and it seems that you are getting angry because i asked you to google what I have stated. It seems that you are taking the childish route in this manner as there is no need for bold as it does not bring any MERIT to what you are claiming.
Scrutiny is a measure of examination, not an argument. To say that my scrutiny doesn't hold merit is similar to saying that an Apple cannot drive. It might be true but it is not possible for an apple, the fruit not the brand lest you be confused, to drive. It is an idiotic statement, made by someone who does not understand what an apple is or in your case, Scrutiny.
How many times do you have to be proven wrong on this subject....Seriously....it is just sad that instead of admitting that you were wrong. What you have stated is illogical and fails to address the fact that Scrutiny can or cannot hold merit. Trying to be stealthy in your insults does not vaildate your response either.
Those who live in glass houses should not throw stones!
|
