Soriku said:
The idea of matter and energy already exisitng is probably too hard to understand for religious people because they require that something sentient had to be the creator. This shouldn't preclude the creator itself, but critical thinking doesn't work well with faith so "God was already there" just suffices. But at the same time, there's no reason any particular god (or gods) is the right one, considering there's no proof of anything outside of your holy text(s) of choice, which you most likely choose because that's what you were raised with or are more familiar with otherwise. IMO, the more attributes you add to a god, the less likely it seems to be. |
i dunno,. perhaps it is just because my atheism is grounded in science but this seems awefully dismissive to me. in the dogma of christianity there are plenty of contradictions that can certainly used to show flaws and errors in our daily worldly interpritations of the bible. but that core idea of "god",. an entity that created our universe,.. there is a lack of evidence to prove but there is also a lack of evidence to disprove. as far as the evidence goes there really isnt' anything we have at our disposal one way or the other.
i have my views on the universe but they are "beliefs" just like any other.