Puppyroach said:
I am perfectly aware of the differences, but to think that Sony will not take measuers to try and move towards an "always-online"-future during this generation is naive to say the least. I heard the exact same arguments about PS+ during the PS3 era: "Sony will never charge for multiplayer", and where are we now? MS had a wider plan with the "always online". It also meant the family sharing would come in effect, saving money for the gamers. Also, it would enable a faster stransition of the industry into streaming-only and digital-only software, which I personally think this industry needs. I agree with you that having always online for a game that never uses it is stupid in its own right, but this is about a system that is always online with all the benefits that come from it, and that is an idea I believe in. I also think Sony believes in it, they are just taking it a different route than MS. So it would be ok with you if PS5 was a streaming-only device? Even though you would always have to be online in ordert to play singleplayer games? |
Your right about that. But the thing is that if by next gen everithing is streamed then prices will be like the pstv 100$ not the 500$ xbox one. So nobody is going to complaine about that since most likely it will come free with some kind of subscription.
It takes genuine talent to see greatness in yourself despite your absence of genuine talent.







