rocketpig said:
Moore's Law applies to standardized costs, which is what I'm talking about. MS will be able to release a $300 machine with superior specs in 2010 and take little or no loss on hardware. Whether they do so or not remains to be seen but given Microsoft's apparent console strategy, we can expect to see a new Xbox in 2010 or 2011. And at that point, Sony needs to make sure the PS3 is well under the price of the new machine. |
I agree on moore's law on standarized costs (at least for another 12-15 years) my point is, standarized costs mean nothing, specially when some companies sell to a profit and become market leaders and other sells to huge losses just to trail behind in sells.
I believe this generation will probably change a bit how machines are designed (DS vs PSP, Wii vs PS360) bigger and more expensive does not necessarily mean better (for the hardware company at least, that is)
Also, the wii will probably have a lower life expectancy than the other 2, as it will look outdated much much faster, the truth is that it is really hard to look at the past or any kind of law to predict the future/outcome of the current generation.
I don't know if Sony will abide by their prediction to keep the ps3 for 8 years, it seems odd, as it will have to compete with the next Xbox and the next nintendo, and it will have to do it with lower specs, and probably not as market leader...
Listen to the voice of reason, then do as I say.








