| Nirvana_Nut85 said
Tell me, what is my response to you? Or the response that you think I am trying to give you? Cause I'm only asking for more evidence.
You clearly missed the " I've wasted enough time arguing with idiots" comment. You can keep asking and I will copy and past the same response
Its a shame you don't understand this so I will explain this to you.
Those links you posted are opinions about scrutiny, judging the situations in which it is acceptable.
I told you that I would not pursue your lack of evidence any further, because I gave you the benefit of the doubt that listing it would be troublesome. And that Level of Scruntiny was not be necessary for an internet forum.
Thus this statement "The fact that you believe your scrutiny would hold any merit is why my grandiose comments I made earlier are applicable." makes no sense
Wow, do you actually beleive the crap that is coming out of your mouth? Of course it makes sense. Your full statement was "I won't inquire any further, but only because subjecting you that amount of scruntiny would be unwarranted. I then stated to go ahead as your scrutiny would hold no merit. You then claimed " Scrutiny, is not an argument, there is no merit to held by it" to which I pointed out how idiotic that statement was which you've back peddled into "Those links you posted are opinions about scrutiny, judging the situations in which it is acceptable". This is why I have not wasted my time sourcing my statements and told you to go google because as I've stated earlier it's a waste of time which you have clearly proven given your statement. It's my fault for engaging as I should have ignored you and listend to this proverb "When arguing with fools, don't answer their foolish arguments, or you will become as foolish as they are."
Scrutiny is not an argument its just a term that describes the level of examination. I will continue to repeat this as long as you continue to display your misunderstanding. We have all summer.
Scurtiny can hold merit as I've stated,and you are back peddling again from your previous answer. Maybe you should take the time to read what you write.
We haven't argued! Before the side tracking of this semantics argument. You made a claim. I asked for your evidence supporting your evidence. You gave NONE
|
