Is the PS4 Pulling a Wii??

[Nirvana_Nut85]

Dr.Henry_Killinger said:

Nirvana_Nut85 said:

You can scrutinize to your hearts content. The fact that you believe your scrutiny would hold any merit is why my grandiose comments I made earlier are applicable.

Since this an informal setting, you can claim whatever you want. But since this is also a public forum, expect at the very least to have evidence provided when its asked for.

The only reason, I haven't pursued this matter any further, is because you stated that the evidence was readily avaliable but to numerous too provide, and I gave you benefit of the doubt.

However, you do not seem to understand basic terms so allow me to use google:

scru·ti·ny

ˈskro͞otn-ē/

noun

 

1. critical observation or examination.

   "every aspect of local government was placed under scrutiny"

   synonyms:

   examination, inspection, survey, study, perusal; More

Scrutiny, is not an argument, there is no merit to held by it, it is only a description of what I was doing to your argument, that is placing it under critcal observation or examination because you have no evidence.

In hindsight, perhaps I went over your head. At the same time, this dicussion wouldn't need to be had if you would simply provide evidence. Furthermore, you cannot ask me to search for the evidence yourself because the burden of proof is on you to explain your statements.

Seems like you have a hard on for copying and pasting definitions to use as filler as you fail to provide an intelligent response.

I truly find the over my head comment amusing, considering what you've stated as scrutiny not being able to hold merit, which , is possibly the most absurd thing I've heard today and while I can provide my opinion about your scrutiny having no value whatsoever for this one I will provide links (you can argue with the writers of the following headlines)

http://www.vnews.com/opinion/6955739-95/letter-where-irs-scrutiny-is-merited

http://host.madison.com/sports/columnists/tom_oates/oates-special-scrutiny-still-merited-for-uw-s-special-teams/article_a64e81dc-138a-538e-b943-cdc91d03fc20.html

http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-6988083.html

I can keep going but either there is a long list of people who "do not seem to understand basic terms" or clearly your wrong. I'm going with the latter.

Back to the links matter. I've argued with enough i...... to know when my time is being wasted. I can post numerous links to each one of my arguments and give a well thought reasonable debate and it will be pointless because you seem like the type that, even though the sky is blue, if you wanted it to be grey you would argue and avoid all facts.