VanceIX said:
Absolutely wrong. Once again, I don't know when you last played PC games, but the market is very different today. If you play Crisis 3 on PC on a high-end card, it blows away the console version. If you play it on medium, it still looks better than the console version. It's all the matter of how a game is optimised. You don't neccessarily optimise a game for the high-end cards per se, but for PCs in general. That way, when you lower the setting, all you do is lose out on some effects like AA or high-end textures, while still keeping a great looking game. |
Again, bad comparison. Crysis 3 is not on current consoles, it is only on last gen consoles. If you had a pc with the specs of a last gen console, good luck getting crysis 3 to run at all on it.
Also, there is a reason pc games list an optimal specs required and a minimum. The games are optimized at certain specs, but you can play a gimped minimal requirement if you want. If they werent optimized for a specific spec, they wouldnt list it.
Anyway, we can go round and round all day, so Im just going to end the conversation by saying it is smart for developers to make pc games optimized for lower specs. It is much easier to find your audience that way. I mean look at Blizzard, most successful pc developer there is and none of their games are optimized for high end PC's. Just some food for thought for you.