"I don't get the point of TLOU Remastered"

[VanceIX]

A_C_E said:

1. I know its a remaster of a game one year old. Everyone knows this. Why are you telling me this? WWHD is over ten years old, it practically requires to be a remake whereas TLoU is only a year old and doesn't benefit as much from being remade. You expect a company to spend ten times the amount of money on just rebuilding from scratch when they could get almost as good results for a tenth of the cost. Boy, you've got a lot to learn about the real world.

2. There's a bit more crispness? That's it? No double the FPS, consistent FPS, better lighting, touched up controls, none of that, just a bit more crispness. Come on...

And those advertisement/developement costs will produce them more money than the omission of the project giving way to more money for future products. So if your worried about anything to do with future titles from Naughty Dog you can rest assured knowing that TLoU Remastered helped with the developement costs of whatever titles ND make this generation.

1. I know plenty about the real world to know when a company screws up developmental cycles. Sony was ill-prepared for the summer, so much that they had to make a year-old remaster their flagship title. That's undeinable. 

2. I would expect double FPS/consistent FPS on new hardware. Of course, very few people complained about the FPS on the original game anyway, so I don't see where you're coming from.

3. And yes, I'll agree with you there, the money will be spent on newer projects. Still doesn't mean it's not a slap in the face of the 50% of the PS4 owners who already own a PS3 and were looking forward to playing more original content this summer. If TLOU was released as a secondary title with multiple other AAA titles in the spotlight, it would be fine. As it is, the only flagship title Sony had prepared for PS4 owners for the summer was a year-old remaster that is only slightly upgraded.