"I don't get the point of TLOU Remastered"

[kupomogli]

GribbleGrunger said:

kupomogli said:

But people can already play The Last of Us.  What about the people who have a PS4 or are going to get a PS4 but don't want The Last of Us, the 80 million who don't want the game on PS4 yet already have access to it.  Beyond Two Souls and the Uncharted series are potentially being ported too. 

A brand new game would be something those who want The Last of Us as well people who don't want The Last of Us or don't want t o purchase it again.  While a The Last of Us port will only satisfy those who want The Last of Us, a game they already have potential access to.  Even if they're a Microsoft or Nintendo fan, they can always purchase a Microsoft or Nintendo console.  The usual reason that people buy consoles, because there's an exclusive they really want to play.

You and all the other people defending all these ports are pretty much, let's just worry about the fraction of people who want The Last of Us for the PS4 and don't worry about the audience who want new games.  If this was Microsoft, all the Sony fanboys in this thread would be bashing the hell out of the Xbox One.

There are plenty of new games coming to the PS4, as well as remastered games for those people who want them.

The above sentence is the reality you and others like to overlook in order to moan (or troll). You and others seem to be labouring under the notion that you can't have both older titles and new titles.

As I've stated plenty of times.  Only four titles that I can't play on my PS3 from launch until well into 2015.  Then there's how all exclusives don't interest everyone, so for me, only two out of those four I even care about ever trying out.  Unlike the Wii U which had over 10 exclusives from it's launch to the same time frame, and those were only NIntendo exclusives or moneyhatted exclusives and not including the others.  Nintendo is actually giving their fanbase games to play during that time.  Sure they did a remake of Wind Waker after a year on the market, but at the same time they've been pushing out other exclusives for their fanbase to actually have games.

It's completely different when your preferred console has no games though.  During that first year, even though Nintendo had 10+ exclusives on their own, as well as many good multiconsole titles, many of you from the Sony fanbase bashed the Wii U for having no games.  I bashed the Wii U because at the time it still only had three games that interested me.  Now that Sony has no games for the first year and a couple months, you're defending the console for what you were bashing another for.  It's pretty hypocrital.  Everyone but you guys are the ones that see it.  Maybe you didn't bash the reason for having no games, but there are many that did that I'm sure are defending Sony with less games.