HylianSwordsman said:
I don't know that it's even fair to talk about quality consistency for a series that's been around for little over a decade with just 7 games vs a nearly 30 year old franchise with nearly 20 games. You're inevitably going to get some that don't shine as much as others, as we're ALREADY seeing with Halo. Different developers, different directors, different approaches over time mean that you can't expect perfection from a franchise every time. Halo has had good quality consistency, as has Zelda. You can say Halo is better if you want, but you can't just say it's objective fact because of something bullshit like "quality consistency" as though that were something measurable and standardized. |
@Bold It is measureable using sales ofcourse.
I don't remember a lot of the portable Zelda's being good ...