| Tamron said: relevant: hexus.net/business/news/components/71929-tsmc-accelerates-development-10nm-process/ |
http://www.eetasia.com/ART_8800681560_480200_NT_ba307701.HTM
10nm also won't get us any cost reduction due to the fact that it's using the same ancient 193nm immersion lithography technology. There's a good reason why Intel settled for the 22nm node instead of the originally projected 20nm node from either TSMC or global foundries and that's because Intel wanted to avoid double patterning.
Oh and don't believe what TSMC says because they haven't been delivering lately much like how GF failed to deliver on the promises for AMD. BTW TSMC's 10nm is practically Intel's 14nm. It's amazing how Intel will have a 3 year lead on TSMC in the chip manufacturing department and Samsung will also end up being superior in this respect to TSMC despite the fact that it's a new player.
