BMaker11 said:
It's a Game of the Year Edition with updates to compliment the PS4, and it's coming out a year after the original. I think I saw someone earlier in the thread say that people's beef with the game is that it's called "Remastered" instead of "Game of the Year". It's only "Remastered" because it's on the PS4, but other than that, for all intents and purposes, it is "TLOU: GOTY Edition". Do you try this hard to undermine any other GOTY edition of a game? Skyrim? Borderlands? LBP? Batman? Gears 2? All those games have re-releases, a year after the original came out, packed with all the DLC, and sold at a reduced price from standard MSRP. It happens pretty much every year with the biggest games from the prior year. But now a year is too soon...and it being too soon is common knowledge? I guess instead of:
Those respective studios should have had completely new games done, because to release such things only a year after the original? It's common knowledge that it's "too soon" |
Don't forget GOTY editions don't sell 1-2M so people are less worried about them... they don't sell to much HW also.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."