By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
kitler53 on 08 July 2014
Edit Thread
gergroy said:
kitler53 said:
...

so we have two senarios..

A) get access to 0% on time and 100% of that content a month late.

vs.

B) get access to 95% on time and %5 of that content a year late.

 

honestly,..  B) is the better senario imo.

think about it.

A) i can't play plants vs. zombies garden warfare at all until six months late.

vs.

B) xbox fans can play destiny the same day i do but have to wait a bit for 1 map pack.

 

would you rather have full access to destiny but have destiny miss the holiday's on xbox?   how would that not be waaaaaaaaaay more damaging to xbox.

I agree that it is probably a better strategy, but it just comes off more shady, if that makes sense?

i dunno.  maybe a bit but then why is no one complaining that batman AK getting fully exclusive content on playstation.  the game will cost the same on both systems so xbox owners are paying the same price for less game and won't even get access to it eventually.    ..and what about minecraft.  ..and assassin's creed.  ..and la noire.   ...and xcom.