Jizz_Beard_thePirate said:
Ummm no it isn't... a) Its a low powered laptop GPU b) Its a very entry level GPU that even the Nvidia 200 series desktop GPUs can beat which launched at 2008-2009 c) Ps3/360 games are more well optomized than PC games. Heck, low-medium settings bf4 on pc looks worse than the graphics on the ps3/360. Just cause it has 1GB of memory with slightly higher memory bandwidth vs the ps3's 512mb doesn't mean much when everything else by comparasion is shit My point btw is that if you look at bf4 on max settings on PC, it looks really, really good but you can still run it on last gen consoles as well as super entry level GPUs and this goes for many other PC games as well. |
The 425M is more powerful than the PS3's GPU (which is iequivalent to the Gefore 7800GT). That's just a fact. Optimizzation to a set architecture has nothing to do with what we're talking. In fact, the 425M being more powerful or less powerful than the PS3, or the 425M being able to play Battefield 4 on low settings has nothing to do with my original statement because BF4 isn't a next gen game. Let me repeat myself, as it seems you've lost your way in this conversation: The next Elder Scrolls will not look as good as the modded version of Skyrim. Elder Scrolls 6 with the same graphical fidelity as Skyrim + every graphical mod (or even half of them) cannot be run by enough PC gamers to support the development costs.
I am the Playstation Avenger.
|
|









