By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
wilco on 07 July 2014
Edit Thread
eva01beserk said:
wilco said:
eva01beserk said:

If you read the thread then you would see many examples where given. BUt the only proof that you are willing to accept is that the devs or phil spencers comes out and says "yes its true, MS is paying us to keep parity" wich will never happen and you can live in denial saying your right.

I myself think that it is almost imposible that MS pays all devs to keep parity or even some, but I am not dumb enough to say no that can never happen and it wont and anything you say is just dumb hate.

Nothing is ever 100% or 0% certain wich is what he was trying to say. So there is a chance that this might be happening. Might be the devs ho do it on their own for the sales but we know for certain that the ps4 can provide 50% better visuals and its not up to devate.

Lol... first you criticize people for speaking in absolutes then you start speaking in absolutes. What does 50% "better" visuals even mean? What rubric are you using?

Your right I did. But keep in mind that is safe to say that 2x2=4 or lava burns or lions eat meat, why? because its been prooven. The ps4 and x1 comparisons have been made, taken apart and analized piece by piece. But to say that about the parity when all we have is the vague comentary of some devs, then its open to speculation and then there is no right answer and nothing can be said with centanty.


The PS4 having better hardware does not guarantee 50% better visuals. If your trying to derive some kind of mathematical formula here don't bother, it's not that simple. Until games are fully created by programs and not humans you won't be able to make those kind of broad statements.

And as you said the commentary from the dev is very vague. It's just typical PR speak, you are choosing to extrapolate a lot of information from a statement that couldn't be any more innocuous. You are free to speculate, but if your speculation is that MS is forcing parity, then that is not a well thought out or logical conclusion.