| DakonBlackblade said:
The logic Im making and youre failling to see is how is that a terrible precedent if ppl are buying it, If ppl buy the thing is because they want it, if theres demand for a product than there is a reson to make it. If ppl dont want it and think its a rip off they wont buy it. Its that simple. If it sells 1 million coppies than theres obviously ppl interested in the product and ND (or whatever company is remastering any given game) has all the right to remaster the game, theyre a company theyre objective is to have profit.
And ye it would have been "fair" to tell gamers "if you dont like it dont buy it in regards to DRM". If The XOne and PS4 had DRM and ppl disagreed with it they wouldnt buy it (heck ppl dindt buy the XOne even after Ms backed off from DRM) the consoles wouldve bombed and the companys would change theyre policies (Ms did so in fear of the repercursion before even testing the market). Videogames are a business like any other, its not about beeing fair its about supply and demand, if theres demand you better be ready to supply it or you gona loose monet, so if ND releases this remaster and it sells like hotckakes, theres a demand therefore developers should come with the supply and profit. |
It's thinking like that, that has allowed everything to spiral downhill into the hole that everything is in these days. There are companies which releas products with fatal defects because its cheaper to suffer a lawsuit than to recall all the products. Just because you can sell someone a rip-off doesn't mean you should or that the customer should just swallow the rip-off. Also, if you're argument is that Sony can do whatever they want as long as people will buy it, then you shouldn't even be on this thread. This thread is for convincing people that they shouldn't buy the game because it sets a bad precedent. If your only argument is "let them buy what they want" then just ignore the thread and go back to buying whatever rip-offs you like.
