Tamron said:
Look at the graph again, buddy.
Nvidia : 23,828,000 Those figures are ONLY the amd and nvidia GPUs, the rest, including "other/unknown" are listed too, but hey, let's pretend that over 75% of laptop gpus aren't Intel right? *rolleyes*
It might have something to do with you ignoring clear and obvious evidence, and bending reality to suit your own argument. This graph is using hard evidence from each manufacturers annual reports, your argument is that based off of nvidias figures, they could not be selling more than 3 million gpus per quarter. Yet all evidence points to the contrary, but have fun im dreamland, it's clear you're one of those types, so i'm done. |
Ok.. its settled. You are delusional.
How am I twisting anything to suit my agenda? I have stated my facts and provided a link to nvidia themselves. If you want to dispuet anything I have said, then dispute that. And what pointhave you made now???????
Put up the same shit and tell me to look at the numbers again? Of course I know those numbers are only the nvidia/amd gpus. IT DOESN'T CHANGE the fact that most of those GPUs go into laptops/all in ones too does it? I am typing on a laptop right now that has intel and nvidia platered over it. Do you realize that nvidia or amd sells gpus that go into integrated systems like laptops/all in ones for as little as $18 a pop? Point is simple, look at nvidias financial reports. Take into consideration all the kinda business they conduct, do the math yourself. And at the end of the day you will find that they are not selling as many discrete GPUs as some would like to think which is what this whole argument was about in the first place.
You say the graph is using hard fact. I did not make up a financial report. Its posted by nvidia themsleves. Sigh... nevermind. I think we should just agree to disagree and let me as you said, live in dreamland.
