As a gamer I'm happy because a lot of the games I have weren't hits and I like them... as long as the big projects bring enough money and the non-hitters are good games and don't hinder them I'm happy.
Sure Sony aim to make all games a hit, but their willingness to keep support even if the game doesn't make a lot of money is why I like them and their variety more than Ninty sure hitters been-there-done-that and MS small number of IPs. Both make more sense financially, but I don't share for Sony shares just for them to keep giving us good games and keeping afloat.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
