By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DakonBlackblade said:
Ka-pi96 said:
lestatdark said:

Here's the match stats, for anyone saying that Colombia were as bad as Brazil http://www.fifa.com/worldcup/matches/round=255953/match=300186461/index.html#overview#nosticky.

Bear in mind that Colombia had about 3 offside fouls, and brazil none, so effectively Brazil did 1,5x as many fouls as Colombia, without even considering the difference in violence.


Offsides don't count as fouls, do they?


No they show as ofsides on the statistics, not as fouls.

Even that being the case, Brazil still did an heftier amount of fouls than Colombia. 

Edit - Why are people saying that just because some of us are pointing out that the referee was way more permisive towards Brazil, we're automatically saying that Colombia was robbed? Colombia did deserve to lose, the were completely outplayed by Brazil especially in the first half. 

Just because A (Brazil playing much better than Colombia) happens, doesn't mean that B is automatically invalidated (Brazil played more violently than Colombia which the referee allowed).



Current PC Build

CPU - i7 8700K 3.7 GHz (4.7 GHz turbo) 6 cores OC'd to 5.2 GHz with Watercooling (Hydro Series H110i) | MB - Gigabyte Z370 HD3P ATX | Gigabyte GTX 1080ti Gaming OC BLACK 11G (1657 MHz Boost Core / 11010 MHz Memory) | RAM - Corsair DIMM 32GB DDR4, 2400 MHz | PSU - Corsair CX650M (80+ Bronze) 650W | Audio - Asus Essence STX II 7.1 | Monitor - Samsung U28E590D 4K UHD, Freesync, 1 ms, 60 Hz, 28"