| Arcturus said: That was a poorly thought out article. He praises Nintendo for showing a snippet of the new Zelda game that had no gameplay, and then claims that Sony "Shat on" E3 by showing a clip of Uncharted 4 with no gameplay. Games should be shown off with gameplay, not snippets where we can only guess if it's actually real or not. - See more at: http://www.gamnesia.com/articles/why-nintendo-restored-faith-in-e3-while-everyone-else-shat-on-it#.U7cb5BCTH_F
Everyone I know right now seems to feel that Uncharted 4 snippet we saw is pretty much the closest thing to reality we have ever gotten - and yes I have to admit it looks really good. Naughty Dog's track record for pushing great realistic visuals is on full display. The problem is - we never actually saw any gameplay. - See more at: http://www.gamnesia.com/articles/why-nintendo-restored-faith-in-e3-while-everyone-else-shat-on-it#.U7cb5BCTH_F
Nintendo decided to try and win people by actually showing their games, and when they had nothing more to show ( Zelda U, as an example), they sort of let it be and tried to avoid talking about it. - See more at: http://www.gamnesia.com/articles/why-nintendo-restored-faith-in-e3-while-everyone-else-shat-on-it#.U7cb5BCTH_F
|
yea they did that for one game to show off that it was open world this time. Next year I guarantee you that they'll have gameplay. They'll probably spend 3 hours playing in hyrule field showing off the sights. The difference is that every Sony/Microsoft game showed fake graphics through cutscenes, almost every Nintendo game by comparison almost exclusively showed real gameplay.







