Supreme Court justice; RBG; displays ignorance of Constitution

[whatever]

Uddermode said:

whatever said:

-CraZed- said:

You are right being employed by someone doesn't allow them to enforce their beliefs on you. How does not paying for someone elses contraceptives amount to forcing your religious views on someone? ...

Not paying for contraceptives because it's against your religion is absolutely 100% forcing your religious views on your employee.

But wouldn't forcing him to pay contraceptives be 100% forcing your religous view(or lack of) against them? This debate does not require religious beliefs at all. Why should anybody have to pay for someone elses choices. Sexual intercourse is a choice and so the use of contraceptives is only on a choice based situation, if you can't afford contraceptives then don't have intercourse. Stop being entitled little kids that believe everybody else should hand you things instead of working hard and then blow your money into whatever you want.

This debate is about allowing a company to not follow the law simply because of the owners religion.  That is the debate.  It has nothing to do with being entitled.