Scisca said:
Personally, I think using contraception is a private decision and shouldn't be covered by insurance at all. It's totally absurd. It's your personal decision what you want to do, why should other people pay for it? It's not life saving, it's not preventing any kind of an illness.
PS. KungKras, the world needs a strong republican president after how Obama is humiliating himself and his country on the international scene. The last president who was played and fooled this much was probably Carter. Obama is one huge mistake. And the argument about more wars under republicans - I somehow haven't noticed any signs of America slowing down with wars between Obama and Bush, so this argument holds no water. Let alone the fact that the age old saying "if you want to have peace, get ready for war" is and always will be true. McCain would make for a bad ass president, but he's probably too old at this point :-/ |
I was looking at it from a pro-life point of view. As in the more widely used birth control is, the less likely people are to get pregnant and consequently less abortions. I've heard critics say that the types of contraception banned in this case were those that could've been seen as such, and was trying to work off of that, saying that they aren't abortions and in fact prevent them. I'm not very good with words sometimes.







