By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Wright said:
michael_stutzer said:

If that many people liked it, they should have got a Gamecube. Being more popular is not TLOU's fault. 


You went towards the complete opposite point I was trying to make. Nobody got hurt with the remake of WW, as well as no one gets hurt with the remaster of TLoU. The same logic applies here, twice.

 

Did anyone got hurt with the remaster of GUN for the 360? Nope.

 

How can many people like a game they haven't played? That voids the whole concept of getting a Gamecube. Alternatively, why people who like TLoU doesn't get a Ps3?

Since there were more effort spent on the WWHD since it was remade and some problems were fixed as I've been told, obviously there is a bigger chance that the making of that game had a bigger effect on the making of newer games. TLOU is mostly a "port", which requires less effort. Not my words, it is coming straight out of the mouth of people criticizing the TLOU PS4 version. To answer your last question, the PS3 is still expensive, and the game is also still expensive. People who have the PS4 may not be able to play the game due to this. On the other hand, you could have got a Gamecube and the game for dirt cheap on many occasions throughout the last decade.

As I've said before, I have no problem with the remake of WWHD. I was talking about the "Well, at least Nintendo remakes 10 year old games." attitude. While I have no problem with both approaches, this type of talking doesn't have any merit, and if we throughly investigate the subject, Nintendo's way is comparatively worse is all I am saying. Hope this makes it clearer.