Good idea, though still flawed. I think what would be better is to have at the end of a review, which is just a statement of what the game does and does not do, is to have two summaries. One from the perspective of someone new to gaming, and another by someone who is a "veteran" of gaming. This way the new person could easily give the latest CoD a 6, or 7, whereas the veteran would chuck it a 2, maybe a 3. That way it deals with expectations from all fronts and highlights the growing stagnation in gaming, or where a veteran gamer could think a game was a good challenge (dark Souls) whereas a new gamer would most likely fail to see the appeal of being whoop-assed every 10 minutes.







