Supreme Court justice; RBG; displays ignorance of Constitution

[Uddermode]

Figgycal said:

Uddermode said:

I don't know about you guys but shouldn't stuff like anticontraceptions and abortions be considered luxurys. Like nobody is forcing you to have relations and so why should other people pay for the stuff you choose to do. Insurance paying for abortions is like insurance paying for liposuction

This decision has nothing to do with abortions and never did. This decision was about certain types of contraceptives that prevent women from having to get abortions. It should be noted that most types of contraceptives were found cosher -- just not the morning after's or the IUD's. So it seems to me like they're picking and choosing which forms of contraceptives they have an issue with. It should also be noted that both vasectomies for men and viagra are still available under their insurance and was never made into a big issue. I think the larger problem is what this means for the future. And whether we will see other, more religious companies take more invasive steps.

Picking and choosing is wrong. Either all types are fought against or none. Also you know what else prevents pregnancy? Not having sex and so again nobody should have to pay for your life choices. Vasectomys and viagra should also be taken off insurance then.