fps_d0minat0r said:
So you agree with me that varity can exist among AAA games. I do have a valid point. The valid point is before we used to get upto 3 AAA PS3 games, now we get 1 AAA and 1 indie.... you still havent disproved that. |
I dont even know where to start. I didnt bring up "budget" you were the first one to use that word and discuss the production cost of games. I responded to your post about low budget =/= diversity which is completely ricidulous and unfounded. diversity is simply variety IE: getting 3 genres of games regardless of their status as indie rather than 2.
Variety does exist amongst AAA games the problem is youre argueing as if we used to get 3 AAA games a month prior to the "indie boom" and thats simply not true. We are simply getting MORE GAMES youre not gettign less of the AAA youre still getting MORE OF THOSE TOO
@ the bolded yes i did matter of factly disprove that. I listed to you all the games that could be considered "AAA" and the amount that plus subsribers received in the 3 years prior to the "indie boom" is less than what has been offered since on the PS3 which is a fact and the quality of the aforementioned games, one could argue has also gone up as well. Do the math, we had less AAA boxed retail games in 3 years prior to the boom than the single year following. So take the total, divide by 36 months do the same for the last year, divide by 12 months and just step away fromt he computer.
At this point I dont even think you understand what youre complaining about anymore. It like the south park episode "they took r jubs!" you have this strawman fear that "Indie games" have ruined your big name retail PSPlus allocation when It is factually not true and actually the opposite based on the ACTUAL GAMES I HAVE LISTED AND POINTED OUT TO YOU OVER THE LIFESPAN OF PLAYSTATION PLUS.