steverhcp02 said:
fps_d0minat0r said:
steverhcp02 said:
fps_d0minat0r said:
Read again, I dont care if they give indies for PS4, but why are PS3 ones not AAA?
Theres is NO shortage of AAA's on PS3, yet next month we are getting some game called Vessel which no-one has heard of.
Anyway, they obviously wouldnt cost Sony $60 even if they did decide to give away PS4 AAA's.
|
didnt we just get tomb raider, bioshock, Uncharted 3 we had infamous (all of them i belivee), lbp2 (maybe cant remember) not to mention the discounts that are very vast.
I mean just the ones I mentioned, oh Batman recently......i mean just those alone for $60 should be good for a year and those are just what i remember in the last 6 months of casually keeping up.
|
You are missing the point.
I'm questioning why we are getting indies on PS3. The fact that we get AAA games doesnt change the fact that we get indies on PS3.
|
I think you miss your own point.
Those indie games available via PSplus do not in any way shape or form have an impact on the "AAA" games. If you believe that including indie games in PSPlus is somehow affecting the AAA games we get youre completely mistaken.
Youre literally argueing for less diversity in the games we get. According to your arguments youre content with the AAA games but dont like looking at extra stuff other people are interested in that you arent forced to download?
Or you think that by not offering indie games we would somehow get more AAA games, eith line of thinking isnt valid.
|
So assuming PS3 had no indie games, you think we wouldnt get 2 AAA's?
lower budget game =/= diversity.
