MikeRox said:
fps_d0minat0r said:
SWORDF1SH said:
fps_d0minat0r said:
At first I didnt mind when it was the best ones from PC making their way to console, but now theres a flood of them ranging from good to ugly, and they are being used as filler for PS+. |
Looking at PS Plus now I see PixelJunk Shooter (83% Metacritic), Trine 2 (84%), NBA 2k14 (85%), Lone Survivor (84%), Dragons Crown (82%), Surge Deluxe (77%), Puppeteer (80%), Sly Copper: Thieves in Time (75%).
That doesn't really match what you are saying. Even the Indie games in that list have respectable score.
If you mean that Indies are PS4 padding the PS Plus offerings then you might have a point but they still offer you the good Indies games. Some games offered in the past for PS4 include Stick it to the Man (74%), Mercenary Kings (70%), Outlast 78%, Don't Starve 78%, Contrast (59%), Resogun (84%). Again all repectable score except for Contrast. Contrast was a good game in concept that was ultimately let down by broken and buggy controls.
|
Well compared to all the AAA's we used to get one PS3.....
If they want to add PS4 indies then fine, but I dont see why the PS3 and Vita games are going downhill.
|
How old are AAA games on PS4? You expect them to already be giving them away?
Me thinks someone has unrealistic expectations if they expect a $5 per month service to give them 2 $60 releases that are less than 12 months old each month. That'll more become the norm in about 2016/17.
|
Read again, I dont care if they give indies for PS4, but why are PS3 ones not AAA?
Theres is NO shortage of AAA's on PS3, yet next month we are getting some game called Vessel which no-one has heard of.
Anyway, they obviously wouldnt cost Sony $60 even if they did decide to give away PS4 AAA's.
