JazzB1987 said:
TBH I pretty much doubt a person is a real gamer if they just play mainstream stuff like the above mentioned. I mean a real cineast is def noone that just watches G.I.Joe or Transformers etc. I would call someone like this a person that likes movies but not a cineast. |
I politely disagree. Anyone who games often is a real gamer, maybe not a interesting one or even inteligent one or hardcore (altough some would say that someone that dedicates himself to a sole game is more hardcore than we common gamer). A cineast shoots movies, independent of genre or quality, someone that watch a lot of movies (even if they are just flickers) likes movies and could be a cinephile, even if it's strange since we associate "real gamer" or "cinephile" with someone that likes and knows about the hobby, but that would be a coinneseur not one of the previous one.
People who take pictures are photographers, not professional one, amateur or enthusiastic perhaps. People who play guitar (even if bad) are guitarists, just owning it doesn't make him a guitarrist tough, someone that really knows how to play a guitar could be a musician or any other term they preffer to use.
You need to diferentiate what is profeciency, dedication or just liking to do some thing.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







